Comparisons

So, here we have a two for one blip. The top is a print from the negative I blipped yesterday, To me this is far too dark, and was left under the UV light for a few minutes too long (40mins). I essentially like the composition, but feel that it is lacking in detail. Could do better methinks.

The bottom one is a print from a negative of the original image that I linked to yesterday. I much prefer this for many reasons. There is much more detail (although there could be a little more around the base of the cross), not so dark (less time under the UV light (30mins)). The main reason is that it is much closer to The Robert Moyes Adam original image.

I will leave it to the viewer to decide their preference. I am quite happy with the results so far, and am finding it quite a steep learning curve. After this morning's efforts (above) it is clear to me that I need to give a little more thought to my process of creating the negatives.