Bounced

Okay, point taken. Yesterdays entry got suspendend because a number of Blippers complained about a 'pair of young women's legs'. When I see her again I'll compliment her. She'll be pleased. (The lady was middle-aged, 53 I guess).

A pair of elegant women's legs... Nothing more, nothing less. Was it the surreptivity of it that made it inappropriate, was it offensive or presumed arrousing? An example of bad taste? I showed something simular before here. Could somebody please define the thin line?

Fortunately some other Blippers gave me conpliments by rewarding the photograph a 5 star rating. "Great shot" and "Like a classy shot from the 1950's, I love the tones". Some positive reactions for a, to my opinion, perfectly harmless shot. For those of you who are curious to see what the fuss is all about, you can view it here.

I will not make required corrections to my entry because I don't agree with the suspension. So lets just keep it suspended, okay. Thanks for the positive comments people!

From now on we'll keep it safe and simple. After all, we don't want to get in trouble with the Picture Police again.

Yours truly